Primary vs. Secondary Commercial Real Estate Transactions in Japan

by

A Practical Guide for Institutional Real Estate Investors

Introduction

Investors entering Japan’s commercial real estate market quickly discover that not all acquisition opportunities reach the market in the same way.

Some properties are acquired directly from developers as newly developed assets.

Others are purchased from existing owners after the properties have already entered the investment market.

Understanding this distinction is useful because the source of an investment opportunity can influence the information available, transaction process, competitive environment and risks that an investor is underwriting.

For the purposes of this article, these two broad acquisition routes will be described as:

Primary transactions — acquisitions of newly developed assets from the developer or development owner, including transactions agreed before or around completion.

Secondary transactions — acquisitions of existing investment properties from an owner that previously acquired or held the asset.

These terms should be used carefully.

Unlike the primary and secondary markets for publicly traded securities, commercial real estate does not operate through two formally separated markets. Individual transactions can also have characteristics that make simple classification difficult.

The distinction is nevertheless useful for investors seeking to understand how institutional-quality real estate opportunities originate and circulate in Japan.

This article examines how primary and secondary transactions differ, why investors participate in each market, and how acquisition strategy can affect access to opportunities.

What Is a Primary Real Estate Transaction?

For the purposes of this article, a primary transaction occurs when an investor acquires a newly developed property from the developer or development owner rather than from a previous investment owner.

The property is effectively entering the institutional investment market for the first time.

A simplified transaction might look like this:

  1. A developer acquires land.
  2. The developer plans and constructs the property.
  3. The asset is offered to institutional investors.
  4. An investor agrees to acquire the property.
  5. Ownership transfers to the investor.

The timing of Step 4 can vary considerably.

An investor might acquire the property after construction has been completed.

Alternatively, the investor may commit to the acquisition while the property is still under development.

The latter may involve a development-stage forward commitment, where the investor agrees in advance to acquire the asset following completion subject to agreed conditions.

For a detailed explanation of this structure, see Understanding Forward Commitment Transactions in Japan.

Primary transactions therefore include more than one transaction structure.

What connects them is the origin of the asset:

The investor is acquiring the property from the party responsible for bringing the newly developed asset into the investment market.

What Is a Secondary Real Estate Transaction?

A secondary transaction, as the term is used in this article, occurs when an investor acquires an existing investment property from a previous owner rather than directly from its developer as a newly delivered asset.

The seller might be:

  • A J-REIT
  • A private real estate fund
  • An institutional investor
  • An operating company
  • A family office
  • A foreign investment fund
  • Another property-owning entity

The asset may have changed hands once or many times since development.

A simplified secondary transaction might therefore look like this:

Developer → Investor A → Investor B → Investor C

The acquisition by Investor A from the developer would represent the primary transaction under the framework used in this article.

The subsequent transfers from Investor A to Investor B and from Investor B to Investor C would be secondary transactions.

Over time, institutional-quality assets can therefore circulate through Japan’s investment market as owners rebalance portfolios, realise gains, recycle capital or change investment strategies.

The Most Important Difference: Where the Asset Comes From

The distinction between primary and secondary transactions is fundamentally about the source and stage of the asset.

A primary acquisition originates from the development pipeline.

A secondary acquisition originates from the existing stock of investment properties.

This difference can influence several aspects of the investment process.

Consideration Primary Transaction Secondary Transaction
Typical seller Developer / development owner Existing property owner
Asset stage Newly developed Existing investment asset
Operating history May be limited Often available
Development exposure May remain Usually substantially reduced
Access route Developer, broker or relationship Broker, owner, AM or relationship
Transaction timing May occur before completion Generally after completion
Underwriting emphasis Future performance and delivery Existing performance plus future assumptions
Opportunity source Development pipeline Existing investment stock

Neither route is inherently superior.

They provide access to different pools of assets and require investors to evaluate somewhat different risks.

Why Investors Buy in the Primary Market

One of the most important reasons is access to new supply.

An investor seeking recently constructed institutional-quality real estate cannot rely entirely on the secondary market.

New buildings first have to enter the investment universe.

Buying from a developer can therefore provide access to assets at the point when they are first becoming available to institutional capital.

This can be particularly relevant for investors with mandates focused on characteristics such as:

  • New construction
  • Modern building specifications
  • Strong environmental performance
  • Particular locations
  • Specific asset sizes
  • Particular operating concepts
  • Long remaining economic life

Primary acquisitions may also allow investors to secure properties before they become available as stabilized assets.

In some cases, they may never become broadly available at completion because another investor has already agreed to acquire them.

This is one reason relationships with developers can matter.

The Developer Pipeline

A developer continuously producing investment properties effectively creates a pipeline of future institutional assets.

That pipeline can become an important source of acquisitions for investors.

Japan’s J-REIT market provides a visible example of the importance of property pipelines.

Some J-REITs receive property information and acquisition opportunities through sponsor relationships. Japan Real Estate Investment Corporation, for example, identifies property pipeline support from its sponsors as one of the support functions available to the investment corporation.

The broader principle extends beyond J-REIT sponsor structures.

Institutional investors can source assets through relationships with:

  • Developers
  • Brokerage firms
  • Asset managers
  • Existing owners
  • Sponsors
  • Operating companies
  • Other market participants

For more on these acquisition channels, see How Institutional Investors Source Commercial Real Estate Opportunities in Japan.

Why Some Primary Opportunities Never Reach the Broad Market

An important characteristic of institutional real estate is that not every asset is marketed to every potential buyer.

A developer may decide to run a broad competitive sale process.

But that is not the only possible route.

A developer may already have relationships with investors that regularly acquire its projects.

If an acceptable transaction can be agreed with one of those investors, there may be little reason to expose the property to a lengthy broad marketing process.

This can be particularly relevant for developers with:

  • Repeat institutional buyers
  • A strong development track record
  • Predictable annual supply
  • Established relationships with asset managers
  • Investors seeking specific future projects

As a result, some assets can effectively be allocated or sold before many investors ever see them.

This does not mean that primary transactions are necessarily “off-market” or that direct acquisitions are always preferable.

It means that access to the development pipeline can affect the opportunity set available to an investor.

For a more detailed discussion, see Buying Commercial Real Estate Directly from Developers in Japan.

Why Investors Buy in the Secondary Market

The secondary market offers a different set of advantages.

The most obvious is information.

An existing investment property may have:

  • Historical rental income
  • Occupancy records
  • Tenant information
  • Operating expenses
  • Capital expenditure history
  • Actual property management data
  • Evidence of market rent
  • Historical operating performance

Investors can therefore compare projections with actual results.

For investors prioritising predictable income, this can be particularly valuable.

A secondary acquisition also generally removes much of the construction uncertainty associated with development-stage investing.

The building already exists.

The investor can physically inspect it.

Tenant performance may already be observable.

Operating assumptions can be tested against historical results.

This does not eliminate investment risk.

It changes the type of risk being underwritten.

Why Existing Owners Sell

A high-quality property being sold does not necessarily indicate a problem with the asset.

Institutional owners sell real estate for many reasons.

A fund may be approaching the end of its investment period.

A J-REIT may recycle capital.

An investor may want to realise gains.

A company may sell real estate to improve capital efficiency.

A portfolio manager may change sector or geographic allocations.

An overseas fund may repatriate capital.

An owner may simply believe that another investment offers a better risk-adjusted return.

Japan has an active institutional acquisition and disposition market. J-REITs, for example, regularly disclose acquisitions and property dispositions as part of their portfolio management activities.

For buyers, these sales create the supply that feeds the secondary market.

Primary Does Not Necessarily Mean Cheaper

It can be tempting to assume that buying directly from a developer should automatically produce a lower price because the asset has not yet passed through another investor.

That assumption is too simplistic.

Institutional real estate pricing depends on:

  • Market demand
  • Asset quality
  • Location
  • Income expectations
  • Interest rates
  • Financing conditions
  • Investor competition
  • Development risk
  • Required returns
  • Seller strategy

A highly desirable new development can attract significant competition before completion.

Conversely, a secondary asset may become available at attractive pricing because an owner has a strong reason to sell.

The relevant question is therefore not:

“Is primary cheaper than secondary?”

It is:

“Does the price appropriately reflect the asset, income, risks and competitive environment of this particular transaction?”

Secondary Does Not Necessarily Mean Lower Quality

The reverse misconception can also arise.

A secondary asset is not simply a property that another investor no longer wants.

Many of Japan’s most institutional-quality properties have changed ownership multiple times.

A building can remain attractive while its ownership changes because the investment objectives of the seller and buyer are different.

For example, one investor may have completed its business plan and decide to realise gains.

Another investor may value the stabilized income and be willing to own the property for a longer period.

The same asset can therefore make sense for different investors at different stages of its investment life cycle.

Primary vs. Secondary: Different Underwriting Questions

The distinction becomes particularly clear during underwriting.

For a primary acquisition, investors may need to ask:

  • Will construction be completed as expected?
  • Are the specifications appropriate?
  • Are projected rents realistic?
  • How quickly will the asset stabilize?
  • Is the developer capable of delivering the project?
  • What contractual protections exist before completion?
  • Does the expected return compensate for development-stage uncertainty?

For a secondary acquisition, the questions may shift:

  • Is current income sustainable?
  • Are existing rents above or below market?
  • What capital expenditure will be required?
  • How strong are the tenants?
  • Why is the current owner selling?
  • How much future rental growth is realistic?
  • What assumptions are already reflected in the price?

Both require forward-looking analysis.

But the starting information is different.

The Role of Brokers

Brokers can participate in both primary and secondary transactions.

A developer may appoint a broker to market a newly developed property.

An existing owner may appoint a broker to run a competitive sale process.

Investors may also use brokers to identify opportunities across multiple owners and developers.

The value of brokerage therefore does not depend on whether a transaction is primary or secondary.

It depends on factors such as:

  • Market coverage
  • Access to sellers
  • Transaction execution
  • Pricing intelligence
  • Investor relationships
  • Knowledge of upcoming opportunities

At the same time, not every transaction requires an intermediary.

Developers and institutional investors with established relationships may transact directly.

Existing owners may also approach known buyers directly in certain circumstances.

Understanding how the seller intends to distribute the opportunity can therefore be as important as identifying the asset itself.

The Role of J-REITs and Institutional Owners

Japan’s J-REIT market illustrates how assets circulate through the institutional real estate ecosystem.

J-REITs acquire properties using investor equity and debt and hold them to generate real estate income.

They also periodically dispose of assets.

This creates an ongoing cycle:

Development → Initial institutional acquisition → Operation → Sale → New institutional owner

The market is therefore not static.

Today’s newly developed primary acquisition can become tomorrow’s secondary-market opportunity.

And a secondary-market buyer can eventually become the next seller.

For investors, understanding where an asset sits within this cycle can provide useful context for both pricing and strategy.

When Might a Primary Acquisition Be More Attractive?

A primary acquisition may be particularly relevant when an investor:

  • Wants newly developed assets
  • Has specific building or location requirements
  • Can underwrite development-stage risk
  • Wants earlier access to future supply
  • Has relationships with developers
  • Can commit capital before stabilization
  • Has a long-term portfolio construction plan

It may also be attractive when suitable assets rarely become available in the secondary market.

In that situation, waiting for an existing owner to sell may significantly reduce the investor’s opportunity set.

When Might a Secondary Acquisition Be More Attractive?

A secondary acquisition may be more suitable when an investor:

  • Prioritises current income
  • Requires historical operating information
  • Has limited tolerance for construction risk
  • Wants to inspect an operating asset
  • Needs greater certainty regarding occupancy
  • Has a shorter acquisition timetable
  • Is pursuing value-add opportunities in existing buildings

Secondary transactions can also provide access to assets that would otherwise be impossible to acquire through the development pipeline—for example, older landmark properties or buildings in locations where new supply is extremely limited.

Is One Market More Competitive?

Not necessarily.

Competition depends on the individual opportunity.

A highly attractive development can receive institutional interest long before completion.

A high-quality stabilized asset can generate an equally competitive bidding process in the secondary market.

However, the competitive universe may differ.

Some investors cannot acquire properties before completion.

Others cannot accept lease-up risk.

Some mandates require stabilized income.

Others specifically target development-stage or value-add opportunities.

The same asset can therefore attract different groups of investors depending on when in its life cycle it is offered for sale.

This is another reason acquisition strategy matters.

An investor that can participate across multiple stages of the asset life cycle may have a broader opportunity set than one restricted to a single transaction type.

Key Insight

Primary and secondary transactions should not be thought of as competing markets where an investor must permanently choose one or the other.

They are different entry points into the same real estate investment ecosystem.

Primary transactions provide access to assets emerging from the development pipeline.

Secondary transactions provide access to the existing stock of institutional investment properties.

Each offers different information, risks and opportunities.

The strongest acquisition strategy may therefore be one that understands both—and knows when each route is appropriate.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a primary commercial real estate transaction?

For the purposes of this article, a primary transaction is the acquisition of a newly developed commercial property from the developer or development owner as the asset enters the institutional investment market.

The transaction may occur after completion or may be agreed earlier through a structure such as a development-stage forward commitment.

What is a secondary commercial real estate transaction?

A secondary transaction is the acquisition of an existing investment property from a previous owner rather than directly from the developer as a newly delivered asset.

The seller may be a REIT, fund, institutional investor, company, family office or another property owner.

Is “primary market” an official legal category in Japanese real estate?

Not in the same sense as primary and secondary markets in securities.

The terminology is used in this article as a practical framework for distinguishing assets entering the investment market from newly developed supply from assets being transferred between existing owners.

Investors should therefore focus on the actual seller, asset stage and transaction structure rather than relying solely on labels.

Are primary transactions always direct transactions with developers?

No.

A developer can appoint a brokerage firm or another intermediary to market a newly developed asset.

“Primary” describes the origin and stage of the asset in this article, not whether a broker participates in the transaction.

Are secondary transactions always brokered?

No.

Many secondary transactions involve brokers, particularly where sellers want broad market exposure or a competitive bidding process.

However, existing owners may also transact directly with known investors.

Is primary real estate cheaper than secondary real estate?

Not necessarily.

Pricing depends on the individual property, market conditions, competition, income expectations and risks being assumed.

A new development with strong investor demand can command aggressive pricing, while a secondary-market seller may sometimes prioritise execution speed or capital recycling.

Why should overseas investors understand the distinction?

Because relying on only one acquisition channel can provide an incomplete view of Japan’s investable real estate market.

Investors focused solely on widely marketed stabilized assets may miss development-stage opportunities, while investors focused only on developer pipelines may overlook attractive assets being recycled by existing institutional owners.

Conclusion

Japan’s institutional commercial real estate market is supplied by two broad sources.

The first is new development.

Developers create assets that enter the investment market and are acquired by institutional capital.

The second is existing investment stock.

Those properties circulate between owners as funds mature, portfolios are rebalanced, capital is recycled and investment strategies change.

For investors, the distinction matters because primary and secondary transactions offer different combinations of access, information and risk.

Primary acquisitions can provide earlier access to newly developed assets but may require investors to underwrite assumptions that have not yet been demonstrated by historical performance.

Secondary acquisitions can provide more operating evidence and reduced development uncertainty, but investors are competing for assets that have already entered the institutional ownership universe.

Neither route is inherently better.

The relevant question is:

Which acquisition route provides the assets, information and risk profile that best match the investor’s strategy?

Investors that understand both the development pipeline and the secondary investment market can evaluate a broader universe of opportunities—and can choose the appropriate point in an asset’s life cycle at which to invest.

References

Related Articles